Skip to main content

Nuremberg Laws

Nuremberg Laws


The Nuremberg laws were about defining citizenship within Germany and preserving
German blood. It provided racial theories that were the basis for persecution of many
Jews in Germany. The laws were passed by all-Nazi representatives. The Reich
Citizenship Law claimed that only people with German or kindred blood could be
citizens of Germany. It asserted that Jews were a race defined by blood, even if this
had no scientifically valid basis. People with three or more grandparents born into a
Jewish community were considered Jewish, even if they hadn’t practiced the religion
before. Jews were labeled “subjects of the state”. Conversion wasn’t an escape
since birth and blood defined citizenship The Law for the Protection of German
Blood and German Honor banned “interracial” relationships between Germans and
Jews. These laws were significant for later developments. They set up the
anti-semitic environment for the Holocaust that affected blacks and Roma in
addition to the Jewish. Other countries adopted similar laws as well.

This week’s reading was short, but very impactful. It was eye opening to see
translations of the official documents that caused Jews such pain during the Holocaust.
I cannot believe the little details they added to make sure that Jews don’t mix with Germans.
How did they think of maids being forced into sexual relations with Jewish masters? It’s
clear that the Nazi government already had false pre-conceptions of the Jews if they
believed this would be a regular occurence. I see no logic in these laws. How did they
actually believe that Judaism was a race? These articles left me with so many questions
on how this was possibly passed. How was Hitler able to convince his Nazis that these
were fair laws? Nazis were regular German citizens before they were Nazis, right? I guess
I just can’t believe that these events took place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture (Feminism) *This blog isn’t divided into sections that the book is in. I just ordered and labeled information to how I saw fit New Feminism Ideas of liberation were spreading widely in the recent century. The 1960s especially showed a wide range of protest movements for the advancement of human rights. Protests for civil rights, against consumerism, against even against middle class values occurred. Although the struggle for suffrage was mainly in the 19th century, the 20th century was also filled with feminist struggles, this time with an emphasis on employment and education instead. A radical form of this feminism was known as “women’s liberation”, which aimed to portray patriarchy as a form of domination. A quote from this group that I found interesting was, “We are considered inferior beings...because we live so intimately with our oppressors, we have been kept from seeing our personal suffering as a political condi...

CST = Living Justice Handout

CST: Catholic Social Teaching Hi everyone! For our final reading assignment, we had to look at the rest of the CST: Living Justice Handout that was given to us earlier in the semester. I don’t think that many people knew CST meant Living Justice, so I set that as my title. After reading through the rest of this packet, what stood out to me the most was sections 3 and 4. Section 3 talks about the role of Family Life in passing on Catholic social teachings, while section 4 discusses the role governments should have and the limitations their powers should have in mobilizing resources. Contrasting these two sections gives us an idea on how to balance the role of government and the role of the family in Catholic social teaching. Family was mentioned as an important tutor of Catholic social teaching because “outside of family life, it is rare to witness a spirit of profound self-sacrifice and generous giving.. That does not count cost to oneself” (87). Catholic teaching suggests tha...

Chapter 14: (First Half): Cultural Genocide and Handling Silver (Updated)

Chapter 14 What really interested me in this half of the chapter was the section about the fur trade in global commerce. Here is a little summary. Agricultural expansion diminished furs in the Americas, and the Little Ice Age increased its demand. The French, British and Dutch competed for furs due to its increasing value. Natives worked to obtain the furs in exchange for goods, and represented a cheap labor force. The environmental price for furs was high: depletion of species was eminent. This trade was at first beneficial for Natives. European goods were beneficial for natives who could distribute them as gifts to gain influence locally, and many of the items they received were very useful. However, trade carried diseases, which decimated populations and led to mourning  wars, where natives actually started stealing people from other tribes to support their depleting numbers. Another problem was also the dependence on european goods. Traditional crafts wer...