Skip to main content

CST = Living Justice Handout


CST: Catholic Social Teaching

Hi everyone! For our final reading assignment, we had to look at the rest of the CST: Living Justice Handout that was given to us earlier in the semester. I don’t think that many people knew CST meant Living Justice, so I set that as my title. After reading through the rest of this packet, what stood out to me the most was sections 3 and 4. Section 3 talks about the role of Family Life in passing on Catholic social teachings, while section 4 discusses the role governments should have and the limitations their powers should have in mobilizing resources. Contrasting these two sections gives us an idea on how to balance the role of government and the role of the family in Catholic social teaching.

Family was mentioned as an important tutor of Catholic social teaching because “outside of family life, it is rare to witness a spirit of profound self-sacrifice and generous giving.. That does not count cost to oneself” (87). Catholic teaching suggests that society prioritizes the health of family life since it profoundly influences the individual. The well-being of a society is dependent on the relationships within the family, since these relationships are the individual’s first, and they influence later relationships.

Government is an important mobilizer of resources for any movement in the community. Ultimately, we must realize that government action is merely “one small part of larger society that is meant to serve, never to control” (91). The government can support, but should not always be the sole driving force of a movement. Citizens will gains satisfaction from belonging to an organization that propels change, which is why many movements are started by voluntary associations rather than the government. A government that is too intrusive diminishes our will to help ourselves. CST suggests to rely on solutions that involve the people who are most affected by the issue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture (Feminism) *This blog isn’t divided into sections that the book is in. I just ordered and labeled information to how I saw fit New Feminism Ideas of liberation were spreading widely in the recent century. The 1960s especially showed a wide range of protest movements for the advancement of human rights. Protests for civil rights, against consumerism, against even against middle class values occurred. Although the struggle for suffrage was mainly in the 19th century, the 20th century was also filled with feminist struggles, this time with an emphasis on employment and education instead. A radical form of this feminism was known as “women’s liberation”, which aimed to portray patriarchy as a form of domination. A quote from this group that I found interesting was, “We are considered inferior beings...because we live so intimately with our oppressors, we have been kept from seeing our personal suffering as a political condi...

Chapter 14: (First Half): Cultural Genocide and Handling Silver (Updated)

Chapter 14 What really interested me in this half of the chapter was the section about the fur trade in global commerce. Here is a little summary. Agricultural expansion diminished furs in the Americas, and the Little Ice Age increased its demand. The French, British and Dutch competed for furs due to its increasing value. Natives worked to obtain the furs in exchange for goods, and represented a cheap labor force. The environmental price for furs was high: depletion of species was eminent. This trade was at first beneficial for Natives. European goods were beneficial for natives who could distribute them as gifts to gain influence locally, and many of the items they received were very useful. However, trade carried diseases, which decimated populations and led to mourning  wars, where natives actually started stealing people from other tribes to support their depleting numbers. Another problem was also the dependence on european goods. Traditional crafts wer...