Skip to main content

Comparing World Wars (Chapter 20)

Comparing the World Wars

Since this chapter was long and filled with many conflicts, I wanted to organize it a little. I
 picked only a few of the facts mentioned in the chapter about the major wars: causes
 and expectations, how they played out, and effects.

No one expected World War I to happen. Everyone was dragged into it through entangling
 alliances. Some major causes are nationalism, militarism, and the assassination of Franz
 Ferdinand. The first world war was a war of attrition, meaning that each side was waiting
 for the other to wear down and run out of resources. It was characterized by trench 
warfare. This contrasts greatly to how Europeans thought the war would end. They thought
 it would be a short war, and the war efforts were greeted with much enthusiasm at first.
 This war left many lasting effects. There was an unprecedented number of casualties 
compared to the wars before, mostly due to the new war technologies. It also led to 
disillusionment of enlightenment values: progress, tolerance, and nationality. It was difficult
 to accept that so many died, only to gain such little land. In a way, World War I promoted 
social mobility. Since many men were dying, women were taken into the workforce to 
temporarily replace the men. Although many gave up their posts later on, it was more 
acceptable for women to work outside the home. A new map of europe also surfaced; the
 concept of national self-determination helped countries break free from their oppressive 
rulers. Colonies gained new military skills and a sense of political awareness. One of the 
most important outcomes was the blaming of Germany, and ultimately, their resentment
 that led to World War II. Finally, other nations started to see the US as a global power.

World War II was vastly different. The cause of WWII in the east was Japan’s imperialist 
tendencies and their wish to be independent from the west; in the west, the cause was 
German nationalism and resentment from the Treaty of Versailles, which placed the blame
 of WWI entirely on Germany and caused it to lose much land, money, and power. Unlike 
WWI, WWII was deliberate and planned. And it was not welcomed with mass enthusiasm
 like WWI was. The second war was characterized by quick blitzkrieg, or “lightning war”, to
 avoid trench warfare and attrition from WWI. This meant quickly moving military forced over
 large areas of land. WWII is the most destructive conflict in world history with 60 million 
casualties. This resulted from better technology and the brutality of total warfare. There was
 a complete mobilization of the  economy towards war. If you don’t know what this means, 
then an example would be like demolishing your local McDonalds to build a machine gun 
manufacturing facility. Women in WWII were taken in for industry and military purposes. 
They gained more roles in the community. There were genocides, like the Holocaust. 
Because war was taxing on Europeans, they now had weak holds on their colonies. This 
diminished Europe’s power in other parts of the world. After the war, many countries were 
looking to establish peace and US assumed its role as a global superpower.

Thank you for reading and have a wonderful day!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture (Feminism) *This blog isn’t divided into sections that the book is in. I just ordered and labeled information to how I saw fit New Feminism Ideas of liberation were spreading widely in the recent century. The 1960s especially showed a wide range of protest movements for the advancement of human rights. Protests for civil rights, against consumerism, against even against middle class values occurred. Although the struggle for suffrage was mainly in the 19th century, the 20th century was also filled with feminist struggles, this time with an emphasis on employment and education instead. A radical form of this feminism was known as “women’s liberation”, which aimed to portray patriarchy as a form of domination. A quote from this group that I found interesting was, “We are considered inferior beings...because we live so intimately with our oppressors, we have been kept from seeing our personal suffering as a political condi...

CST = Living Justice Handout

CST: Catholic Social Teaching Hi everyone! For our final reading assignment, we had to look at the rest of the CST: Living Justice Handout that was given to us earlier in the semester. I don’t think that many people knew CST meant Living Justice, so I set that as my title. After reading through the rest of this packet, what stood out to me the most was sections 3 and 4. Section 3 talks about the role of Family Life in passing on Catholic social teachings, while section 4 discusses the role governments should have and the limitations their powers should have in mobilizing resources. Contrasting these two sections gives us an idea on how to balance the role of government and the role of the family in Catholic social teaching. Family was mentioned as an important tutor of Catholic social teaching because “outside of family life, it is rare to witness a spirit of profound self-sacrifice and generous giving.. That does not count cost to oneself” (87). Catholic teaching suggests tha...

Chapter 14: (First Half): Cultural Genocide and Handling Silver (Updated)

Chapter 14 What really interested me in this half of the chapter was the section about the fur trade in global commerce. Here is a little summary. Agricultural expansion diminished furs in the Americas, and the Little Ice Age increased its demand. The French, British and Dutch competed for furs due to its increasing value. Natives worked to obtain the furs in exchange for goods, and represented a cheap labor force. The environmental price for furs was high: depletion of species was eminent. This trade was at first beneficial for Natives. European goods were beneficial for natives who could distribute them as gifts to gain influence locally, and many of the items they received were very useful. However, trade carried diseases, which decimated populations and led to mourning  wars, where natives actually started stealing people from other tribes to support their depleting numbers. Another problem was also the dependence on european goods. Traditional crafts wer...