Skip to main content

Chapter 19

Japanese Industrialization


My focus for this blog will be the final section centered on Japan. Japan was the only 
nation outside of Europe that was able to launch its own Industrial Revolution during 
the 19th century. Its quick modernization surprised other countries and made it a country
to be admired. Many came to Japan to study its history and learn from its achievements. 
So how did Japan do it?

For a few centuries, Japan was ruled by shoguns. The shoguns’ purpose was to prevent 
the daimyo, or the feudal lords, from fighting and causing a civil war. The shoguns wanted
peace and stability. They had strict rules, and even divided up Japanese society into a 
hierarchy: samurai, peasants, artisans, and merchants on the bottom. The goal of these 
shoguns were to freeze Japan. They were worried a civil war would break out like before.
Their strict rules were not liked by the public. The people eventually started to complain. 
Samurai wanted to trade and merchants were dissatisfied with their low status, even 
though they were rich and even had the samurai relying on them. More dissatisfaction in 
the shogun regime arose due to widespread corruption and the inability of the shogun to 
deal with a famine in the 1830s. The shogun were not liked.

However, their reforms for peace contributed to the economic growth in Japan. Without 
the shogun regime, there would have been a lack of agricultural innovation and 
manufacturing enterprises. By 1750, Japan was already one of the world’s most 
urbanized countries.

After Commodore Perry from the US came to demand the right to trade with Japan, the 
shogunate yielded. This led to further loss of support from the people, and a takeover by 
a group of young samurai. This new group now had the purpose of breaking with the past
and advancing Japanese society. Japan started to work on genuine national unity, by 
replacing daimyo with governors. Everyone legally became a commoner in order to be 
more equal. Japan sought out western education and technology. And although they were
fascinated by it, they still maintained their identity by taking what they liked from other 
cultures and mixing it with their own traditions.

In my personal opinion, Japan’s road was unique and unexpected. Even if the shogunate
wanted a stable and unmoving society, the opposite somehow happened, which was 
surprising. In the end, it benefited Japan. And all of this happened relatively peacefully 
compared with other countries. Japan’s transition is definitely an ideal. I think one of 
Japan’s strong points in this chapter is how it readily accepted other cultures to improve 
on itself. The Japanese did not think that they had the best, and they were open-minded 
enough to see look into other countries’ ways of doing things. The shogunate’s refusal to
go to war was also helpful, even if that meant losing the respect of the people. Overall, I 
think Japan’s open-mindedness and peacefulness helped contribute to its quick transition.
One criticism I would have is Japan’s inability to deal with the social issues in its 
communities. Although the country advanced in terms of industrialization, Japan in this 
time period had not given women their proper rights, even if they were in desperate need 
of women’s labor. Public life for women was extremely restricted.

Thank you for reading and have a wonderful day! :)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture

Chapter 23: Capitalism and Culture (Feminism) *This blog isn’t divided into sections that the book is in. I just ordered and labeled information to how I saw fit New Feminism Ideas of liberation were spreading widely in the recent century. The 1960s especially showed a wide range of protest movements for the advancement of human rights. Protests for civil rights, against consumerism, against even against middle class values occurred. Although the struggle for suffrage was mainly in the 19th century, the 20th century was also filled with feminist struggles, this time with an emphasis on employment and education instead. A radical form of this feminism was known as “women’s liberation”, which aimed to portray patriarchy as a form of domination. A quote from this group that I found interesting was, “We are considered inferior beings...because we live so intimately with our oppressors, we have been kept from seeing our personal suffering as a political condi...

CST = Living Justice Handout

CST: Catholic Social Teaching Hi everyone! For our final reading assignment, we had to look at the rest of the CST: Living Justice Handout that was given to us earlier in the semester. I don’t think that many people knew CST meant Living Justice, so I set that as my title. After reading through the rest of this packet, what stood out to me the most was sections 3 and 4. Section 3 talks about the role of Family Life in passing on Catholic social teachings, while section 4 discusses the role governments should have and the limitations their powers should have in mobilizing resources. Contrasting these two sections gives us an idea on how to balance the role of government and the role of the family in Catholic social teaching. Family was mentioned as an important tutor of Catholic social teaching because “outside of family life, it is rare to witness a spirit of profound self-sacrifice and generous giving.. That does not count cost to oneself” (87). Catholic teaching suggests tha...

Chapter 14: (First Half): Cultural Genocide and Handling Silver (Updated)

Chapter 14 What really interested me in this half of the chapter was the section about the fur trade in global commerce. Here is a little summary. Agricultural expansion diminished furs in the Americas, and the Little Ice Age increased its demand. The French, British and Dutch competed for furs due to its increasing value. Natives worked to obtain the furs in exchange for goods, and represented a cheap labor force. The environmental price for furs was high: depletion of species was eminent. This trade was at first beneficial for Natives. European goods were beneficial for natives who could distribute them as gifts to gain influence locally, and many of the items they received were very useful. However, trade carried diseases, which decimated populations and led to mourning  wars, where natives actually started stealing people from other tribes to support their depleting numbers. Another problem was also the dependence on european goods. Traditional crafts wer...